Asked by h
To critique scientific arguments and increase the validity of scientific evidence, scientists
replace the data and conclusions from experiments that fail.
design new experiments to prove other scientists are wrong.
repeat their tests until they get the desired results.
review the experiments and conclusions of other scientists.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Correct answer: review the experiments and conclusions of other scientists.
Why: Critiquing and validating science is done through peer review, critical evaluation, and independent replication of experiments. These practices test methods, check for errors or biases, and either support or challenge conclusions. The other choices describe misconduct or biased practice (falsifying data, p-hacking, or designing tests solely to “prove” someone wrong rather than to objectively test hypotheses).
Why: Critiquing and validating science is done through peer review, critical evaluation, and independent replication of experiments. These practices test methods, check for errors or biases, and either support or challenge conclusions. The other choices describe misconduct or biased practice (falsifying data, p-hacking, or designing tests solely to “prove” someone wrong rather than to objectively test hypotheses).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.