Asked by dk
Which of following explains what happens if the judicial branch finds that a law does not meet the criteria of the rule of law?(1 point)
Responses
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch has no power to fix the problem, since it has no law-making powers.
Responses
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a new law to correct the issue.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch writes a request to the legislative branch to have it changed.
The judicial branch has no power to fix the problem, since it has no law-making powers.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
The judicial branch declares the law unconstitutional.
Explanation: Through judicial review courts can strike down laws that violate the constitution or rule of law. The judiciary cannot write new laws or force the legislature to change them.
Explanation: Through judicial review courts can strike down laws that violate the constitution or rule of law. The judiciary cannot write new laws or force the legislature to change them.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.