Asked by r
You will be able to use the same criteria to make every decision.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
I can do that — I just need a little detail so I apply the same criteria consistently in the way you expect.
Quick plan and questions so we match:
1. Scope — what kinds of decisions should I apply this to? (examples: hiring, prioritizing tasks, answering policy questions, financial choices, product design, moderation)
2. The criteria — list the specific criteria you want used (examples: cost, speed, accuracy, fairness, legal compliance, user safety, ROI, simplicity). If you want weights or a strict priority order, say so.
3. Decision rule — how to turn criteria into a decision (examples: weighted score with threshold; lexicographic priority where one criterion always wins ties; require all criteria to pass; veto rules for hard constraints).
4. Edge cases & exceptions — any situations where different rules apply or where you allow me to ask for input instead of deciding?
5. Output format — how you want decisions presented (single recommendation, ranked options with scores, brief justification, step-by-step rationale, or a short summary).
6. Review & updating — how often should the criteria be revisited and who can change them?
Example template you can copy/edit:
- Scope: [e.g., task prioritization]
- Criteria (with weights): cost (30%), time-to-deliver (25%), impact (30%), strategic fit (15%)
- Rule: compute weighted score; recommend top option if score >= 70; otherwise return options and ask for guidance
- Hard constraints: budget <= $X, must comply with law/policy
- Output: rank top 3 with scores and 1-line justification each
Tell me the scope and the specific criteria (and whether you want weights or a priority order). I’ll build the decision rule and apply it consistently, and I’ll flag any time I think an exception or new information should change the rule.
Quick plan and questions so we match:
1. Scope — what kinds of decisions should I apply this to? (examples: hiring, prioritizing tasks, answering policy questions, financial choices, product design, moderation)
2. The criteria — list the specific criteria you want used (examples: cost, speed, accuracy, fairness, legal compliance, user safety, ROI, simplicity). If you want weights or a strict priority order, say so.
3. Decision rule — how to turn criteria into a decision (examples: weighted score with threshold; lexicographic priority where one criterion always wins ties; require all criteria to pass; veto rules for hard constraints).
4. Edge cases & exceptions — any situations where different rules apply or where you allow me to ask for input instead of deciding?
5. Output format — how you want decisions presented (single recommendation, ranked options with scores, brief justification, step-by-step rationale, or a short summary).
6. Review & updating — how often should the criteria be revisited and who can change them?
Example template you can copy/edit:
- Scope: [e.g., task prioritization]
- Criteria (with weights): cost (30%), time-to-deliver (25%), impact (30%), strategic fit (15%)
- Rule: compute weighted score; recommend top option if score >= 70; otherwise return options and ask for guidance
- Hard constraints: budget <= $X, must comply with law/policy
- Output: rank top 3 with scores and 1-line justification each
Tell me the scope and the specific criteria (and whether you want weights or a priority order). I’ll build the decision rule and apply it consistently, and I’ll flag any time I think an exception or new information should change the rule.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.