Asked by grim
Read the excerpt.
A researcher at a local university recently came out with a study saying excessive screen time is actually good for students. The study comes to a series of unbelievable conclusions, including that screens help students connect with other people. How can that be true? Plenty of evidence shows that screen time ruins students’ sleep time and causes behavioral issues in school. This one foolish researcher put out a contradictory study, but it’s plain wrong.
Which bias does the author show about screen time?
The author believes that screen time is the leading cause of health issues.
The author believes that teenagers do not use screen time for socializing.
The author believes that the screen time research study is incorrect.
The author believes that the research on screen time is incomplete.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
The author believes that the screen time research study is incorrect.
Evidence: the writer calls the researcher “foolish,” labels the study’s conclusions “unbelievable,” and says “it’s plain wrong.”
Evidence: the writer calls the researcher “foolish,” labels the study’s conclusions “unbelievable,” and says “it’s plain wrong.”
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.