Question

The Court of Appeals held that in light of these authorities, Alvarado's age and experience must be a factor. . . . A minor with no criminal record would be more likely to feel coerced by police tactics and conclude he is under arrest than would an experienced adult, the Court of Appeals reasoned. This required extra "safeguards."

According to Justice Kennedy, why did the Court of Appeals overturn Alvarado’s conviction? Check all that apply.

The police used extra protections for him.
The police coerced his confession.
Minors require special legal protections.
He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.
He was experienced enough to understand his rights.

Answer 1

- Minors require special legal protections.
- He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.