Question

Question
1
Question
2
A)
Which statement draws a correct conclusion about how boundaries created by European nations inAfrica affected the African peoples?
(1 point)
Boundaries drawn by European nations only affected the economic development of African peoples.
Boundaries drawn by European nations gave preferential treatment to ethnic majorities over minority
populations.
Boundaries drawn by European nations strengthened some divisions between African ethnic groups and
weakened others.
Boundaries drawn by European nations respected the ethnic and linguistic diversity of African peoples.
A)
What two African nations remained independent after the Berlin Conference?
(1 point)
Liberia and Ethiopia
Kingdom of Kongo and Great Zimbabwe
Darfur and Igbo
Yoruba and Biafra
Question
3
Question
4
A)
Which statement
best
investigates the relationship between social Darwinism and New Imperialism?
(1 point)
Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify
the colonization of other nations.
Social Darwinism focused exclusively on science and did not apply to the era of New Imperialism.
Social Darwinism portrayed African peoples as culturally unique and rejected their colonization by other
nations.
Social Darwinism believed that through the intermarriage of different peoples, the strongest and smartest
would create the best governments.
A)
Which statement
best
summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective ofpeacemaking?
(1 point)
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin
American.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S.
Question
5
A)
Which of the following charts
best
compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?
(1 point)
Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force
Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict peacefully
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
Expand U.S. economic interests
Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military
Establish financial stability
Reduced use of military intervention
Expand U.S. economic interests
End conflict by paying off aggressors
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
Big Stick and Dollar Diplomacy
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully
Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
End conflict with military
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce US control over Latin America

Answer 1

Here are the correct answers:

1) Boundaries drawn by European nations strengthened some divisions between African ethnic groups and weakened others.

2) Liberia and Ethiopia

3) Social Darwinism portrayed White Europeans as culturally superior to other races and was used to justify the colonization of other nations.

4) The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.

5) The second chart (Big Stick: Establish U.S. military power; Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America — Dollar: Reduce use of military intervention; Establish financial stability; Expand U.S. economic interests).