Asked by puyr
page 19 of 19
Proofs About Angles Quick Check
4 of 54 of 5 Items
pick the correct answer
Question
Lenny wrote a paragraph proof of the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem. What mistake did Lenny make in his proof?
HK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
is a perpendicular bisector of IJ¯¯¯¯¯¯
, and L is the midpoint of IJ¯¯¯¯¯¯
. M is a point on the perpendicular bisector, HK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. By the definition of a perpendicular bisector, I know that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. By the definition of a perpendicular bisector, I also know that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles. ∠MLI≅∠MLJ
because of the Right Angle Congruence Theorem. I can also say that ML¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅ML¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
by the Reflexive Property of Congruence. With this information, I know that △MLI≅△MLJ
by the SAS Congruence Theorem. Since the triangles are congruent, the CPCTC Theorem allows me to know that IL¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JL¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. Knowing that these segments are congruent proves the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem.
(1 point)
Responses
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that ∠LMI
and ∠LMJ
are right angles, not that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles.
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that ∠LMI
and ∠LMJ
are right angles, not that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles.
Lenny did not make a mistake. His proof is correct.
Lenny did not make a mistake. His proof is correct.
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that IL¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JL¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
, not that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
.
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that line segment cap i liters is congruent to line segment cap j liters, not that line segment cap i cap m is congruent to line segment cap j cap m.
The SAS Congruence Theorem tells you that △MLI≅△JLM
, not that △MLI≅△MLJ
.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Lenny misapplied SAS. He used IM ≅ JM and ML ≅ ML together with the right angles at L, but that right angle is not the included angle between IM and ML, so SAS does not apply. Because these are right triangles the correct route is HL (hypotenuse–leg): the hypotenuses IM and JM are congruent and the leg ML is congruent, so the triangles are congruent.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.