Asked by .
Read the text below from the Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. Georgia. Then answer the question that follows.
The Indian nations had always been considered as distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights as undisputed possessors of the soil, from time immemorial, . . .
What was the court's opinion in the case and how did it affect the Cherokee?
A.
The court held that American Indians were US citizens and entitled to constitutional protections. The court's ruling allowed the Cherokee to retain possession of their homeland.
B.
The court held that because American Indians were not US citizens, the government did not have to respect their claims to land. The government then forced the Cherokee to leave their homeland.
C.
The court held that American Indian tribes were sovereign and therefore not subject to US laws. Despite a ruling in the Cherokee's favor, the government forced them to leave their homeland.
D.
The court held that American Indian tribes were not sovereign and could not enter into treaties. Because prior treaties with the Cherokee were invalid, the Cherokee retained possession of their homeland.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
C
The Court (Chief Justice Marshall) ruled that Indian tribes are sovereign political communities and Georgia laws did not apply to them. Despite that ruling in the Cherokee's favor, the federal and state authorities did not enforce it, and the Cherokee were subsequently removed from their land (the Trail of Tears).
The Court (Chief Justice Marshall) ruled that Indian tribes are sovereign political communities and Georgia laws did not apply to them. Despite that ruling in the Cherokee's favor, the federal and state authorities did not enforce it, and the Cherokee were subsequently removed from their land (the Trail of Tears).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.