Asked by ny
Under Roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed
belief that the accused was guilty.
proof that a crime had been committed.
a lawyer willing to take the case to trial.
a witness to vouch for the accuser’s character.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Proof that a crime had been committed.
Under Roman procedure prosecutions were typically private and required evidence (witnesses, facts) to support the charge; false or groundless accusations could be punished (calumnia). A lawyer or mere belief in guilt alone was not sufficient.
Under Roman procedure prosecutions were typically private and required evidence (witnesses, facts) to support the charge; false or groundless accusations could be punished (calumnia). A lawyer or mere belief in guilt alone was not sufficient.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.