Asked by safnklnvkjleamv
3. Did US citizens with investments in Cuba support the new Cuban government after the
Cuban Revolution? Why or why not?
• A. They were opposed to the new government. The new Cuban government took over
private property in Cuba, including property owned by US citizens.
• B. They were opposed to the new government. Cuba had nuclear missiles, which
people in the United States feared the new government would use.
• C. They supported the new government. The previous dictator was very unpopular and
US citizens wanted Cuban citizens to enjoy a free democracy.
• D. They supported the new government. The previous government taxed US sugar at a
high rate and they hoped the new government would reduce taxes.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Answer: A.
Explanation: US investors generally opposed Castro’s government because it nationalized and expropriated private property — including many US-owned sugar plantations, utilities, hotels, and other businesses — without adequate compensation. Those seizures destroyed the value of their investments and provoked US government measures (diplomatic break, embargo, claims litigation).
Why the others are wrong, briefly:
- B: The Cuban Missile Crisis (Soviet missiles on Cuba) happened later and was not the reason US investors opposed Castro; their opposition centered on loss of property and profits.
- C and D: US investors did not back Castro out of support for democracy or lower taxes; they were primarily concerned with protecting their assets, and Castro’s policies nationalized industries rather than lowering taxes to favor foreign owners.
Explanation: US investors generally opposed Castro’s government because it nationalized and expropriated private property — including many US-owned sugar plantations, utilities, hotels, and other businesses — without adequate compensation. Those seizures destroyed the value of their investments and provoked US government measures (diplomatic break, embargo, claims litigation).
Why the others are wrong, briefly:
- B: The Cuban Missile Crisis (Soviet missiles on Cuba) happened later and was not the reason US investors opposed Castro; their opposition centered on loss of property and profits.
- C and D: US investors did not back Castro out of support for democracy or lower taxes; they were primarily concerned with protecting their assets, and Castro’s policies nationalized industries rather than lowering taxes to favor foreign owners.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.