Asked by …
Which statement best describes historians' critique of Great Britain's policy of appeasement? (1 point)
• Appeasement was too harsh.
• Appeasement was ineffective.
• Appeasement further enforced the Treaty of Versailles.
• Appeasement was not a permanent solution.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Appeasement was ineffective.
Historians argue that appeasement failed to check Nazi aggression (it emboldened Hitler, undermined deterrence, and only delayed—rather than prevented—war), so it did not achieve its aims.
Historians argue that appeasement failed to check Nazi aggression (it emboldened Hitler, undermined deterrence, and only delayed—rather than prevented—war), so it did not achieve its aims.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.