Asked by jeff
Consider the following graph, which details the observed bear population in two national parks.
A graph titled Bears Observed in Park has month on the y-axis and number of bears observed on the y-axis, going from 37 to 53. In the same month, there are 2 points marked on the graph. All points are connected by overlapping lines.
Of the following, which option or options would help make this graph less misleading?
I. The scale on the x-axis should be resized.
II. The scale on the y-axis should be resized.
III. The identity of the two parks should be more clearly differentiated.
a.
I and II
b.
II and III
c.
III only
d.
I and III
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Mark this and return
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
B
II and III. The y-axis range (37–53) is too narrow and exaggerates differences—use a fuller scale (e.g., include 0) to avoid misleading appearance. Also clearly differentiate the two parks (different colors/markers and a legend). Rescaling the x-axis (months) isn't necessary.
II and III. The y-axis range (37–53) is too narrow and exaggerates differences—use a fuller scale (e.g., include 0) to avoid misleading appearance. Also clearly differentiate the two parks (different colors/markers and a legend). Rescaling the x-axis (months) isn't necessary.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.