Asked by nana
A student is using a computer model to observe the effects of weathering and erosion. The student finds the computer simulation to be boring and dull and wishes they could do a hands-on lab to see the effects of long-term erosion. Which of these is NOT a benefit of a computer simulation model over a lab investigation while studying these concepts?
Responses
A It takes a lot more resourcesIt takes a lot more resources
B It can speed up a process that takes thousands of yearsIt can speed up a process that takes thousands of years
C It is likely more accurateIt is likely more accurate
D It is easier to set up and clean up in a classroom
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
C — It is likely more accurate.
Computer simulations can speed up long-term processes (B) and are easier to set up/clean up in class (D). They also typically use fewer physical materials (contrary to A). But simulations are not necessarily more accurate than real-world lab/field observations — they are approximations based on assumptions and inputs.
Computer simulations can speed up long-term processes (B) and are easier to set up/clean up in class (D). They also typically use fewer physical materials (contrary to A). But simulations are not necessarily more accurate than real-world lab/field observations — they are approximations based on assumptions and inputs.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.