Asked by Nissan GT-R R35 Nismo
An image with a graph, the curved line starts at (-40, 0) and remains constant along the x-axis, then makes a sharp curve at (-1, 0) and continues to rise steeply until (2, 40)
What would an equation for this graph be?
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
There are many functions that match that description. Here are three simple choices (pick one based on whether you want an exact flat segment, a sharp corner, or a smooth transition).
1) Piecewise linear (sharp corner at x = −1, exact values at endpoints)
y = 0 for x ≤ −1
y = (40/3)(x + 1) for −1 < x < 2
y = 40 for x ≥ 2
This is the simplest: flat at 0 up to −1, rises linearly to 40 at x = 2, then stays at 40.
2) Smooth cubic join (flat / horizontal tangent at −1 and at 2, so it blends smoothly into the constant pieces)
y = 0 for x ≤ −1
y = a x^3 + b x^2 + c x + d for −1 < x < 2
y = 40 for x ≥ 2
with
a = −80/27, b = 40/9, c = 160/9, d = 280/27.
Equivalently (clearing denominators): 27y = −80 x^3 + 120 x^2 + 480 x + 280 for −1 ≤ x ≤ 2.
This cubic satisfies y(−1)=0, y′(−1)=0 and y(2)=40, y′(2)=0, so it exactly matches the flat segments and gives a smooth steep rise between −1 and 2.
3) Smooth sigmoid approximation (no exact flat regions but a steep S-shaped rise)
y = 40 / (1 + exp(−k(x − 0.5)))
Choose k to control steepness; e.g. k = 6 gives a sharp rise roughly between x = −1 and x = 2, with y(−1) ≈ 0 and y(2) ≈ 40.
If you want one specific recommendation: use the piecewise cubic above if you want exact 0 up to −1, exact 40 after 2, and a smooth steep ramp in between. If you want the absolute simplest formula, use the piecewise linear version.
1) Piecewise linear (sharp corner at x = −1, exact values at endpoints)
y = 0 for x ≤ −1
y = (40/3)(x + 1) for −1 < x < 2
y = 40 for x ≥ 2
This is the simplest: flat at 0 up to −1, rises linearly to 40 at x = 2, then stays at 40.
2) Smooth cubic join (flat / horizontal tangent at −1 and at 2, so it blends smoothly into the constant pieces)
y = 0 for x ≤ −1
y = a x^3 + b x^2 + c x + d for −1 < x < 2
y = 40 for x ≥ 2
with
a = −80/27, b = 40/9, c = 160/9, d = 280/27.
Equivalently (clearing denominators): 27y = −80 x^3 + 120 x^2 + 480 x + 280 for −1 ≤ x ≤ 2.
This cubic satisfies y(−1)=0, y′(−1)=0 and y(2)=40, y′(2)=0, so it exactly matches the flat segments and gives a smooth steep rise between −1 and 2.
3) Smooth sigmoid approximation (no exact flat regions but a steep S-shaped rise)
y = 40 / (1 + exp(−k(x − 0.5)))
Choose k to control steepness; e.g. k = 6 gives a sharp rise roughly between x = −1 and x = 2, with y(−1) ≈ 0 and y(2) ≈ 40.
If you want one specific recommendation: use the piecewise cubic above if you want exact 0 up to −1, exact 40 after 2, and a smooth steep ramp in between. If you want the absolute simplest formula, use the piecewise linear version.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.