Asked by bill
Taking Standardized Test Scores Out of College Admissions
While most four-year colleges and universities in the United States require students to submit standardized test scores in order to be considered for admission, a growing number of institutions are making this part of the application optional. Opponents of standardized testing assert that these scores do not fairly represent a student’s skills. In fact, studies analyzing cumulative GPAs and graduation rates have shown few significant differences in these indicators of academic success between students who submit standardized test scores and those who do not. Making standardized test scores optional in the admissions process has created a more diverse student population, as students who choose not to submit these scores are more likely to be minorities, first-generation college students, women, and students with learning disabilities. Proponents argue that a better indicator of students’ potential in postsecondary education is their performance in high school. Students who can demonstrate a pattern of diligence, focus, and inquisitiveness in high school are most likely to be successful in a four-year college or university.
Which statements provide evidence for the affirmative claim? Check all that apply.
“Most four-year colleges and universities in the United States require students to submit standardized test scores.”
“These scores do not fairly represent a student’s skills.”
“Making standardized tests scores optional in the admissions process has created a more diverse student population.”
“A better indicator of students’ potential in postsecondary education is their performance in high school.”
“Students who can demonstrate a pattern of diligence, focus, and inquisitiveness in high school are more likely to be successful.”
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Select statements 2, 3, 4, and 5.
- “These scores do not fairly represent a student’s skills.” — supports removing reliance on tests.
- “Making standardized tests scores optional in the admissions process has created a more diverse student population.” — shows a positive outcome of making scores optional.
- “A better indicator of students’ potential in postsecondary education is their performance in high school.” — gives an alternative basis for admissions.
- “Students who can demonstrate a pattern of diligence, focus, and inquisitiveness in high school are more likely to be successful.” — supports using high-school performance as a predictor.
The first statement is background about current practice, not evidence for the affirmative claim.
- “These scores do not fairly represent a student’s skills.” — supports removing reliance on tests.
- “Making standardized tests scores optional in the admissions process has created a more diverse student population.” — shows a positive outcome of making scores optional.
- “A better indicator of students’ potential in postsecondary education is their performance in high school.” — gives an alternative basis for admissions.
- “Students who can demonstrate a pattern of diligence, focus, and inquisitiveness in high school are more likely to be successful.” — supports using high-school performance as a predictor.
The first statement is background about current practice, not evidence for the affirmative claim.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.