Asked by Makayla
Which of the following is not an example of a recursive sequence?
4, 13, 22, 31, ...
2, 3, 6, 18, ...
6, 9, 15, 24, ...
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
The sequence 2, 3, 6, 18, ... is not (in the usual simple sense) a recursive arithmetic or geometric sequence.
Reason:
- 4, 13, 22, 31, ... is arithmetic: a1 = 4, a_n = a_{n-1} + 9.
- 6, 9, 15, 24, ... has differences 3, 6, 9, ... so it is recursive: a1 = 6, a_n = a_{n-1} + 3(nā1).
- 2, 3, 6, 18, ... is neither arithmetic (differences 1, 3, 12, ...) nor geometric (ratios 3/2, 2, 3). You also cannot find constants p,q with a_n = p a_{n-1} + q for all terms (solving from the first two terms gives p = 3, q = ā3, which fails at the fourth term).
Thus the second sequence is the one that is not an example of a simple recursive sequence of the common types.
Reason:
- 4, 13, 22, 31, ... is arithmetic: a1 = 4, a_n = a_{n-1} + 9.
- 6, 9, 15, 24, ... has differences 3, 6, 9, ... so it is recursive: a1 = 6, a_n = a_{n-1} + 3(nā1).
- 2, 3, 6, 18, ... is neither arithmetic (differences 1, 3, 12, ...) nor geometric (ratios 3/2, 2, 3). You also cannot find constants p,q with a_n = p a_{n-1} + q for all terms (solving from the first two terms gives p = 3, q = ā3, which fails at the fourth term).
Thus the second sequence is the one that is not an example of a simple recursive sequence of the common types.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.