Asked by tt
Which evidence best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE, but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division?(1 point)
Responses
The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated.
The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated.
The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.
The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.
The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE.
The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE.
Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204
CE.
Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1 2 0 4 CE.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East.
This shows a long-term shift and rivalry between eastern and western Christian authorities that developed well before 1054, supporting the idea the schism was gradual rather than a single-event rupture.
This shows a long-term shift and rivalry between eastern and western Christian authorities that developed well before 1054, supporting the idea the schism was gradual rather than a single-event rupture.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.