Asked by err4
In the Supreme Court’s decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu
was not a spy and deserved equal rights.
was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.
was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.
was a spy but was free to go back to Japan.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Answer: "was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights."
Explanation: In Korematsu v. United States (1944) the Supreme Court upheld the internment orders and Korematsu’s conviction, ruling that the wartime exclusion of Japanese Americans was justified by military necessity even though Korematsu himself was not shown to be a spy. (The decision has since been widely criticized and effectively repudiated.)
Explanation: In Korematsu v. United States (1944) the Supreme Court upheld the internment orders and Korematsu’s conviction, ruling that the wartime exclusion of Japanese Americans was justified by military necessity even though Korematsu himself was not shown to be a spy. (The decision has since been widely criticized and effectively repudiated.)
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.