Asked by Nebuchadnezzar
Which statement best critiques the winner-take-all electoral process?(1 point)
Responses
A winner-take-all system tends to depress voter turnout.
A winner-take-all system tends to depress voter turnout.
The winner-take-all system makes it more difficult for a third political party to gain traction.
The winner-take-all system makes it more difficult for a third political party to gain traction.
The winner-take-all system discourages the two-party system in the United States.
The winner-take-all system discourages the two-party system in the United States.
The winner-take-all process allows political parties to win seats in proportion to the percentage of votes cast.
Responses
A winner-take-all system tends to depress voter turnout.
A winner-take-all system tends to depress voter turnout.
The winner-take-all system makes it more difficult for a third political party to gain traction.
The winner-take-all system makes it more difficult for a third political party to gain traction.
The winner-take-all system discourages the two-party system in the United States.
The winner-take-all system discourages the two-party system in the United States.
The winner-take-all process allows political parties to win seats in proportion to the percentage of votes cast.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
The winner-take-all system makes it more difficult for a third political party to gain traction.
Explanation: Winner-take-all incentives favor larger parties and lead to a two-party system (Duverger’s law), making it hard for third parties to win seats.
Explanation: Winner-take-all incentives favor larger parties and lead to a two-party system (Duverger’s law), making it hard for third parties to win seats.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.