Asked by e
Thesis: Video games have a positive effect on cognitive development and behavior because of improved attention and visual‑spatial skills, enhanced problem‑solving and decision‑making, and social‑emotional benefits such as teamwork, mood regulation, and stress relief.
1) Improved attention and visual‑spatial skills support cognitive development.
- Explanation sentence: Better attention and visual‑spatial processing from gaming help children and adults process information more quickly and accurately in real‑world tasks.
- Evidence and support: Research summarized by the Cleveland Clinic reports that many types of video games train sustained attention, visual tracking, and the ability to quickly parse complex visual scenes — skills that transfer to other activities that require fast, focused perception (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH press release also reports that video gaming is associated with better overall cognitive performance in children, which includes improvements consistent with enhanced attention and visuospatial abilities (Chaarani et al.
- Explanation sentence: Problem‑solving challenges and rapid in‑game decisions train planning, flexible thinking, and quicker, more accurate decision‑making, which translate to improved executive function.
- Evidence and support: The Cleveland Clinic article notes that many games present multi‑step problems, require strategizing, and give immediate feedback, which exercises planning and cognitive flexibility (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH report`s findings that gamers showed better cognitive performance in children support the idea that gameplay can be associated with stronger reasoning and executive skills (Chaarani et al.
3) Social‑emotional benefits (teamwork, mood regulation, reduced stress) improve behavior — plus a counterargument and rebuttal.
- Explanation sentence: Playing games cooperatively or competitively in social contexts builds teamwork, communication, and can provide stress relief and positive mood effects that improve behavior and social functioning.
- Evidence and support: The Cleveland Clinic coverage highlights social and emotional benefits of gaming, including opportunities for teamwork, social connection, and stress reduction when play is balanced and purposeful (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH press release also frames gaming`s associations with better cognitive outcomes in children, which often coincide with improved school engagement and behavior (Chaarani et al.
- Counterargument: Critics argue that video games — especially violent ones or excessive play — can increase aggression, encourage antisocial behavior, or lead to addiction and poorer real‑world functioning.
- Rebuttal: Both sources caution context matters; the Cleveland Clinic emphasizes moderation and appropriate content and notes many benefits occur with balanced use (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH statement uses careful language (“may be associated”) and reports positive cognitive associations in children rather than inevitable harms (Chaarani et al.
Taken together, the evidence supports that when gameplay is age‑appropriate, time‑limited, and socially supervised, the cognitive and social benefits outweigh the risks.
Conclusion: The evidence from these reputable sources indicates video games can have overall positive effects on cognitive development and behavior — improving attention and visual‑spatial skills, strengthening problem‑solving and decision‑making, and offering social‑emotional benefits — provided play is age‑appropriate and balanced.
org/are-video-games-good-for-you Chaarani, B.
“Video Gaming May Be Associated With Better Cognitive Performance in Children.
gov/news-events/news-releases/video-gaming-may-be-associated-better-cognitive-performance-children (In‑text citations used: Cleveland Clinic, 2024; Chaarani et al.
Body Paragraph 1: First Supporting Topic A.
Body Paragraph 2: Second Supporting Topic A.
Example: One important aspect of this topic is.
Example: One important aspect of this topic is.
C. Explanation: Explain how the evidence supports your idea.
C. Explanation: Explain how the evidence supports your idea.
Example: This is important because… This helps explain that… D.
Example: This is important because… This helps explain that… D.
Transition Sentence: Lead into the next paragraph with a brief summary or connection to the next point.
Transition Sentence: Lead into the next paragraph with a brief summary or connection to the next point.
Topic Sentence: Acknowledge a potential counterargument or opposing viewpoint.
B. Counterargument Explanation: Present the opposing side`s strongest argument in a fair and balanced way.
C. Rebuttal: Refute the counter argument by providing evidence or reasoning that weakens it.
D. Transition Sentence: Summarize the rebuttal and move toward the conclusion.
647 Words
Check Plagiarism
1) Improved attention and visual‑spatial skills support cognitive development.
- Explanation sentence: Better attention and visual‑spatial processing from gaming help children and adults process information more quickly and accurately in real‑world tasks.
- Evidence and support: Research summarized by the Cleveland Clinic reports that many types of video games train sustained attention, visual tracking, and the ability to quickly parse complex visual scenes — skills that transfer to other activities that require fast, focused perception (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH press release also reports that video gaming is associated with better overall cognitive performance in children, which includes improvements consistent with enhanced attention and visuospatial abilities (Chaarani et al.
- Explanation sentence: Problem‑solving challenges and rapid in‑game decisions train planning, flexible thinking, and quicker, more accurate decision‑making, which translate to improved executive function.
- Evidence and support: The Cleveland Clinic article notes that many games present multi‑step problems, require strategizing, and give immediate feedback, which exercises planning and cognitive flexibility (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH report`s findings that gamers showed better cognitive performance in children support the idea that gameplay can be associated with stronger reasoning and executive skills (Chaarani et al.
3) Social‑emotional benefits (teamwork, mood regulation, reduced stress) improve behavior — plus a counterargument and rebuttal.
- Explanation sentence: Playing games cooperatively or competitively in social contexts builds teamwork, communication, and can provide stress relief and positive mood effects that improve behavior and social functioning.
- Evidence and support: The Cleveland Clinic coverage highlights social and emotional benefits of gaming, including opportunities for teamwork, social connection, and stress reduction when play is balanced and purposeful (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH press release also frames gaming`s associations with better cognitive outcomes in children, which often coincide with improved school engagement and behavior (Chaarani et al.
- Counterargument: Critics argue that video games — especially violent ones or excessive play — can increase aggression, encourage antisocial behavior, or lead to addiction and poorer real‑world functioning.
- Rebuttal: Both sources caution context matters; the Cleveland Clinic emphasizes moderation and appropriate content and notes many benefits occur with balanced use (Cleveland Clinic, 2024).
The NIH statement uses careful language (“may be associated”) and reports positive cognitive associations in children rather than inevitable harms (Chaarani et al.
Taken together, the evidence supports that when gameplay is age‑appropriate, time‑limited, and socially supervised, the cognitive and social benefits outweigh the risks.
Conclusion: The evidence from these reputable sources indicates video games can have overall positive effects on cognitive development and behavior — improving attention and visual‑spatial skills, strengthening problem‑solving and decision‑making, and offering social‑emotional benefits — provided play is age‑appropriate and balanced.
org/are-video-games-good-for-you Chaarani, B.
“Video Gaming May Be Associated With Better Cognitive Performance in Children.
gov/news-events/news-releases/video-gaming-may-be-associated-better-cognitive-performance-children (In‑text citations used: Cleveland Clinic, 2024; Chaarani et al.
Body Paragraph 1: First Supporting Topic A.
Body Paragraph 2: Second Supporting Topic A.
Example: One important aspect of this topic is.
Example: One important aspect of this topic is.
C. Explanation: Explain how the evidence supports your idea.
C. Explanation: Explain how the evidence supports your idea.
Example: This is important because… This helps explain that… D.
Example: This is important because… This helps explain that… D.
Transition Sentence: Lead into the next paragraph with a brief summary or connection to the next point.
Transition Sentence: Lead into the next paragraph with a brief summary or connection to the next point.
Topic Sentence: Acknowledge a potential counterargument or opposing viewpoint.
B. Counterargument Explanation: Present the opposing side`s strongest argument in a fair and balanced way.
C. Rebuttal: Refute the counter argument by providing evidence or reasoning that weakens it.
D. Transition Sentence: Summarize the rebuttal and move toward the conclusion.
647 Words
Check Plagiarism
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
I can’t run an authoritative plagiarism scan against subscription databases (Turnitin, Crossref, publishers, etc.). However, I can:
- Point out likely plagiarism risks in your draft,
- Give concrete steps to reduce similarity and properly cite sources,
- Recommend tools you can use to run a formal similarity check, and
- Offer to rewrite or paraphrase your text into an original 647‑word draft with correct citations if you want.
Quick assessment of your draft (issues and risks)
- Incomplete citations: you repeatedly cite “Cleveland Clinic, 2024” and “Chaarani et al.” but don’t provide full reference details (author names, article titles, URLs, publication dates). That makes it hard to verify attribution and looks like under‑referencing.
- Use of source titles and language: you include a near‑verbatim title (“Video Gaming May Be Associated With Better Cognitive Performance in Children”) and text that echoes press‑release wording. Direct reuse of titles or distinctive phrases is fine if quoted and cited exactly; otherwise paraphrase and cite.
- Boilerplate/placeholder text: many “Example” and outline fragments remain; leaving them in a final draft could look like incomplete work rather than plagiarism, but they do increase the chance that you accidentally reuse someone else’s phrasing when expanded.
- Repetition and template phrasing: sentences like “The Cleveland Clinic reports that many types of video games train sustained attention…” are likely close paraphrases of a source. Close paraphrase without clear attribution can be flagged as similarity by plagiarism checkers.
- Missing direct quotations: if you use exact wording from the Cleveland Clinic or NIH texts, put it in quotation marks and give a full citation. If you paraphrase, make the wording clearly your own and cite the source.
How to check for plagiarism (recommended tools)
- Turnitin: gold standard in academic settings (instructors/Universities often provide access).
- Grammarly Premium plagiarism checker or ProWritingAid: easy consumer access; good for web sources.
- Unicheck, Quetext, Copyscape: alternative online checkers.
- Google exact phrases in quotes: quick, free way to find verbatim copying from web pages.
How to interpret similarity reports (guidelines)
- 0–10%: usually safe, but check matched fragments to ensure proper quoting/citation.
- 10–25%: usually acceptable if matches are properly cited and largely from your bibliography; review matched passages to ensure paraphrase/quotation is correct.
- >25%: review carefully — may indicate overuse of source wording, structural overlap, or uncredited text that needs rewriting or quoting.
Practical steps to reduce plagiarism risk
1. Provide full references: author(s), year, full title, publisher/website, and URL. Example formats (APA): Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Are video games good for you? https://www.clevelandclinic.org/… ; Chaarani, B., et al. (2024). [Title]. NIH News Release. URL.
2. Use quotations for any distinctive or exact phrasing, with citations. Keep direct quotes short.
3. Paraphrase thoroughly: rewrite ideas in your own words and structure; don’t just swap synonyms.
4. Add original analysis: explain why the studies matter, limitations, and how they relate to your argument — original content reduces similarity.
5. Attribute ideas in text: e.g., “A Cleveland Clinic review (2024) finds…,” or “Chaarani et al. (2024) report…”
6. Remove placeholder text and expand with original examples, data interpretation, and transitions.
7. Run a similarity check with one of the tools above and edit any flagged passages.
If you want, I can:
- Produce a fully rewritten 647‑word essay based on your thesis that paraphrases sources and includes properly formatted in‑text citations and a reference list (you can tell me which citation style: APA, MLA, Chicago),
- Or highlight sentences from your current draft that are most likely close to your sources and suggest rephrases.
Which would you prefer? If you want a rewrite, tell me: citation style and whether you want the exact Cleveland Clinic and NIH URLs included (paste them if you have them).
- Point out likely plagiarism risks in your draft,
- Give concrete steps to reduce similarity and properly cite sources,
- Recommend tools you can use to run a formal similarity check, and
- Offer to rewrite or paraphrase your text into an original 647‑word draft with correct citations if you want.
Quick assessment of your draft (issues and risks)
- Incomplete citations: you repeatedly cite “Cleveland Clinic, 2024” and “Chaarani et al.” but don’t provide full reference details (author names, article titles, URLs, publication dates). That makes it hard to verify attribution and looks like under‑referencing.
- Use of source titles and language: you include a near‑verbatim title (“Video Gaming May Be Associated With Better Cognitive Performance in Children”) and text that echoes press‑release wording. Direct reuse of titles or distinctive phrases is fine if quoted and cited exactly; otherwise paraphrase and cite.
- Boilerplate/placeholder text: many “Example” and outline fragments remain; leaving them in a final draft could look like incomplete work rather than plagiarism, but they do increase the chance that you accidentally reuse someone else’s phrasing when expanded.
- Repetition and template phrasing: sentences like “The Cleveland Clinic reports that many types of video games train sustained attention…” are likely close paraphrases of a source. Close paraphrase without clear attribution can be flagged as similarity by plagiarism checkers.
- Missing direct quotations: if you use exact wording from the Cleveland Clinic or NIH texts, put it in quotation marks and give a full citation. If you paraphrase, make the wording clearly your own and cite the source.
How to check for plagiarism (recommended tools)
- Turnitin: gold standard in academic settings (instructors/Universities often provide access).
- Grammarly Premium plagiarism checker or ProWritingAid: easy consumer access; good for web sources.
- Unicheck, Quetext, Copyscape: alternative online checkers.
- Google exact phrases in quotes: quick, free way to find verbatim copying from web pages.
How to interpret similarity reports (guidelines)
- 0–10%: usually safe, but check matched fragments to ensure proper quoting/citation.
- 10–25%: usually acceptable if matches are properly cited and largely from your bibliography; review matched passages to ensure paraphrase/quotation is correct.
- >25%: review carefully — may indicate overuse of source wording, structural overlap, or uncredited text that needs rewriting or quoting.
Practical steps to reduce plagiarism risk
1. Provide full references: author(s), year, full title, publisher/website, and URL. Example formats (APA): Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Are video games good for you? https://www.clevelandclinic.org/… ; Chaarani, B., et al. (2024). [Title]. NIH News Release. URL.
2. Use quotations for any distinctive or exact phrasing, with citations. Keep direct quotes short.
3. Paraphrase thoroughly: rewrite ideas in your own words and structure; don’t just swap synonyms.
4. Add original analysis: explain why the studies matter, limitations, and how they relate to your argument — original content reduces similarity.
5. Attribute ideas in text: e.g., “A Cleveland Clinic review (2024) finds…,” or “Chaarani et al. (2024) report…”
6. Remove placeholder text and expand with original examples, data interpretation, and transitions.
7. Run a similarity check with one of the tools above and edit any flagged passages.
If you want, I can:
- Produce a fully rewritten 647‑word essay based on your thesis that paraphrases sources and includes properly formatted in‑text citations and a reference list (you can tell me which citation style: APA, MLA, Chicago),
- Or highlight sentences from your current draft that are most likely close to your sources and suggest rephrases.
Which would you prefer? If you want a rewrite, tell me: citation style and whether you want the exact Cleveland Clinic and NIH URLs included (paste them if you have them).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.