Asked by jayden
First, the printed framework forming the ear was the right size and shape for each child, whereas an ear donated by another person would not have been an exact match. In addition, because the new ear grew from the child’s own cells, the child’s body did not reject it. If the ear had come from a donor, the child would have needed life-long medication to prevent rejection. Even then, rejection could still have been possible.Box ends
end of part 4start of part 5
Activity
Reread the part of the passage in the box. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
to argue that more people should consider becoming organ donors
to provide details about the problems scientists have with bioprinted organs
to give examples of problems with donor organs that bioprinting can solve
to express a certain point of view about using donor versus bioprinted organs
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
to give examples of problems with donor organs that bioprinting can solve
Explanation: the paragraph contrasts donor-ear issues (size mismatch, rejection, lifelong medication) with benefits of a bioprinted ear made from the child’s own cells.
Explanation: the paragraph contrasts donor-ear issues (size mismatch, rejection, lifelong medication) with benefits of a bioprinted ear made from the child’s own cells.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.