Question

what does the act suggest about u.s attitudes toward imperial responsibility in the 1930s 1 the us rejected all responsibility for overseas territories 2 the u.s sought to expand territorial control indefinitely 3 the u.s aimed to reduce direct colonial rule while protecting strategic interest 4 the u.s believed colonial subjects were unfit for self-government. which section of the act best illustrates this attitude 1. the requirement for English-language public education 2. the u.s right to intervene to preserve order and protect life and property 3 the promise of future treaties after independence 4 the assumption of philipine debts by the new government

Answer 1

Answer: 3 and 2.

Explanation: The Philippine Independence (Tydings–McDuffie) Act of 1934 set a timetable for ending direct colonial rule while reserving U.S. authority to protect strategic interests. That mixed approach — granting eventual independence but keeping powers to intervene to “preserve order and protect life and property” — best fits option 3, and the clause granting the U.S. right of intervention (option 2) most directly illustrates that attitude.