Asked by Nebuchadnezzar
The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson is an example of judicial restraint. On the other hand, the decision in Brown v. Board of Education is an example of judicial activism. Write a sentence for each, supporting the concept shown by the decisions. (2 sentences).(2 points)
in simple words give me multiple responses
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
1) Plessy: The Court showed judicial restraint by leaving state segregation laws alone and following past decisions.
Brown: The Court showed judicial activism by overturning that old rule and ruling school segregation illegal.
2) Plessy: The justices practiced restraint by deferring to lawmakers and not striking down state rules on race.
Brown: The justices acted as activists by changing the law and declaring "separate" schools unequal.
3) Plessy: The decision is restraint because the Court stuck with precedent and let states make their own policy.
Brown: The decision is activism because the Court took the lead to correct injustice and rewrite legal precedent.
4) Plessy: The Court showed restraint by avoiding big changes and upholding existing laws on segregation.
Brown: The Court showed activism by making a bold decision that ended legal school segregation across the country.
5) Plessy: This case is an example of judicial restraint because the judges deferred to state authority and past rulings.
Brown: This case is an example of judicial activism because the judges overturned old precedent to enforce equal protection.
6) Plessy: The ruling reflects restraint since the Supreme Court chose not to interfere with state social policies.
Brown: The ruling reflects activism since the Supreme Court stepped in to force social and legal change.
Brown: The Court showed judicial activism by overturning that old rule and ruling school segregation illegal.
2) Plessy: The justices practiced restraint by deferring to lawmakers and not striking down state rules on race.
Brown: The justices acted as activists by changing the law and declaring "separate" schools unequal.
3) Plessy: The decision is restraint because the Court stuck with precedent and let states make their own policy.
Brown: The decision is activism because the Court took the lead to correct injustice and rewrite legal precedent.
4) Plessy: The Court showed restraint by avoiding big changes and upholding existing laws on segregation.
Brown: The Court showed activism by making a bold decision that ended legal school segregation across the country.
5) Plessy: This case is an example of judicial restraint because the judges deferred to state authority and past rulings.
Brown: This case is an example of judicial activism because the judges overturned old precedent to enforce equal protection.
6) Plessy: The ruling reflects restraint since the Supreme Court chose not to interfere with state social policies.
Brown: The ruling reflects activism since the Supreme Court stepped in to force social and legal change.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.