Question

Which of the following compares the role of monumental architecture in the Aztec and Inca capitals?(1 point)
Responses

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had one temple that signified the sun god, whereas the Inca structure had two temples that signified God.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had one temple that signified the sun god, whereas the Inca structure had two temples that signified God.

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had two temples that signified the Tiawanaku gods, whereas the Inca structure had one temple that signified God.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had two temples that signified the Tiawanaku gods, whereas the Inca structure had one temple that signified God.

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had a landscape design that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.
Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure had a landscape design that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.

Answer 1

Both monumental structures were built in capital cities as places to worship; the Aztec structure was a pyramid that signified two gods, whereas the Inca structure was rounded and signified one god.

Explanation: Tenochtitlan’s Templo Mayor was a twin-temple pyramid for Huitzilopochtli and Tlaloc, while Cuzco’s main temple (Coricancha) was the principal Inca shrine dedicated to Inti, the sun god.