Asked by Blaine
Science has generated a vast body of knowledge that has changed our lives. Science has given us the technology to see beyond our own planet, the ability to live longer, healthier lives, a glimpse into the world of microorganisms, tools for preserving natural resources and biodiversity, and new ways of communicating with people all over the world. However, even science has limitations. There are some things that science cannot answer or address. Evaluate each of the questions below. Choose ALL those that cannot be answered by science.
Responses
A Is there evidence of life on Mars?Is there evidence of life on Mars?
B Does God intervene in human affairs?Does God intervene in human affairs?
C What is the main diet of most black bears in the United States?What is the main diet of most black bears in the United States?
D When is euthanasia the right thing to do?When is euthanasia the right thing to do?
E Should gene therapy be used to cure genetic disease?
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
B, D, and E.
Brief reasons:
- B (Does God intervene in human affairs?): Generally a metaphysical/supernatural claim, not testable or falsifiable by empirical methods, so science cannot definitively answer it.
- D (When is euthanasia the right thing to do?): A moral/ethical question. Science can provide facts (effects, prognosis, pain levels) but cannot by itself determine moral rightness.
- E (Should gene therapy be used to cure genetic disease?): A policy/ethical judgment. Science can evaluate safety, effectiveness, risks and benefits, but the value-laden “should” requires ethical, social, and political decisions beyond empirical science.
A and C are empirical questions science can investigate (evidence of life on Mars; black bear diet).
Brief reasons:
- B (Does God intervene in human affairs?): Generally a metaphysical/supernatural claim, not testable or falsifiable by empirical methods, so science cannot definitively answer it.
- D (When is euthanasia the right thing to do?): A moral/ethical question. Science can provide facts (effects, prognosis, pain levels) but cannot by itself determine moral rightness.
- E (Should gene therapy be used to cure genetic disease?): A policy/ethical judgment. Science can evaluate safety, effectiveness, risks and benefits, but the value-laden “should” requires ethical, social, and political decisions beyond empirical science.
A and C are empirical questions science can investigate (evidence of life on Mars; black bear diet).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.