Asked by Anonymous
Which of the following describes intended impacts of a government’s decision? (1 point)
Responses
The government’s decision to implement a Hazard Mitigation Program reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to implement a Hazard Mitigation Program reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to implement FEMA to regulate air quality reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to implement FEMA to regulate air quality reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to pass the Clean Air Act of 1970 reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to pass the Clean Air Act of 1970 reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
The government’s decision to pass the presidential disaster declaration reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
The government’s decision to pass the Clean Air Act of 1970 reduced air pollutants and improved public health.
Reason: The Clean Air Act was specifically intended to control and reduce air pollution to protect public health. The other options describe actions not primarily aimed at air-quality improvement (FEMA doesn't regulate air quality, hazard mitigation programs and disaster declarations have different primary aims).
Reason: The Clean Air Act was specifically intended to control and reduce air pollution to protect public health. The other options describe actions not primarily aimed at air-quality improvement (FEMA doesn't regulate air quality, hazard mitigation programs and disaster declarations have different primary aims).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.