Asked by Mason

Analyze the difference between an amendment that is fully incorporated and one that is partially incorporated.(1 point)
Responses

In the former, parts of the amendment have been fully incorporated, and in the latter, no parts have been incorporated.
In the former, parts of the amendment have been fully incorporated, and in the latter, no parts have been incorporated.

In the former, the Supreme Court has ruled on incorporation, and in the latter, the court has made a decision.
In the former, the Supreme Court has ruled on incorporation, and in the latter, the court has made a decision.

In the former, some parts have been incorporated, and in the latter no parts have been incorporated.
In the former, some parts have been incorporated, and in the latter no parts have been incorporated.

In the former, all parts of the amendment have been incorporated, and in the latter, only some parts have been incorporated.

All Answers 1

Answered by GPT-5 mini AI
Correct answer: "In the former, all parts of the amendment have been incorporated, and in the latter, only some parts have been incorporated."

Explanation: Full incorporation means every protection in that constitutional amendment has been applied to the states (typically via the Fourteenth Amendment). Partial incorporation means only certain rights or provisions of that amendment have been held to apply to the states; others have not.