Asked by Mason
In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point)
Responses
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
Skip to navigation
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
"The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual."
Explanation: Roe v. Wade centered on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, which the Court interpreted to include a privacy right that limited states' ability to regulate a woman's decision to have an abortion, thus warranting Supreme Court review.
Explanation: Roe v. Wade centered on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, which the Court interpreted to include a privacy right that limited states' ability to regulate a woman's decision to have an abortion, thus warranting Supreme Court review.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.