Asked by Mason
In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point)
Responses
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
"The right to privacy named in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual."
Explanation: Roe raised whether a Texas law criminalizing abortion violated the constitutional right to privacy (via the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment), so the Supreme Court's judicial review was warranted to decide that constitutional question.
Explanation: Roe raised whether a Texas law criminalizing abortion violated the constitutional right to privacy (via the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment), so the Supreme Court's judicial review was warranted to decide that constitutional question.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.