Asked by julie
Consider the following graph, which details the observed bear population in two national parks.
A graph titled Bears Observed in Park has month on the y-axis and number of bears observed on the y-axis, going from 37 to 53. In the same month, there are 2 points marked on the graph. All points are connected by overlapping lines.
Of the following, which option or options would help make this graph less misleading?
I. The scale on the x-axis should be resized.
II. The scale on the y-axis should be resized.
III. The identity of the two parks should be more clearly differentiated.
a.
I and II
b.
II and III
c.
III only
d.
I and III
Please select the best answer from the choices provide
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
b. II and III
Explanation: The y-axis range (37–53) is too narrow and omits zero, which exaggerates differences between the parks (resize the y-scale). Also the two parks need clear differentiation (different colors/markers and a legend). Resizing the x-axis (months) is not necessary.
Explanation: The y-axis range (37–53) is too narrow and omits zero, which exaggerates differences between the parks (resize the y-scale). Also the two parks need clear differentiation (different colors/markers and a legend). Resizing the x-axis (months) is not necessary.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.