Asked by Makayla
In what ways did the cotton gin affect the South?
Cotton became the "king" of the Southern cash crops
Manufacturing grew in the South.
A social caste system was established in the South.
Slavery became more important and attitudes about it hardened.
Land under production declined.
Cotton became the "king" of the Southern cash crops
Manufacturing grew in the South.
A social caste system was established in the South.
Slavery became more important and attitudes about it hardened.
Land under production declined.
Answers
Answered by
j
y
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
Here’s a quick true/false evaluation of each statement with a brief explanation:
- Cotton became the "king" of the Southern cash crops — True. The cotton gin made short‑staple cotton profitable, spurring a massive cotton boom and making cotton the dominant Southern export.
- Manufacturing grew in the South — False (mostly). The gin spurred agricultural expansion, not industrialization; the South remained overwhelmingly agrarian and most cotton was processed in Northern and British mills.
- A social caste system was established in the South — False (misleading). The gin did not create a brand new caste system; it reinforced and sharpened existing class hierarchies by concentrating wealth and political power in a planter elite, widening the gap between wealthy planters, small farmers, and enslaved people.
- Slavery became more important and attitudes about it hardened — True. Demand for labor to plant, tend and pick expanding cotton crops greatly increased slavery’s economic importance and led to stronger pro‑slavery ideology.
- Land under production declined — False. Cotton cultivation expanded dramatically, often exhausting soil and prompting planters to clear and cultivate new lands (westward expansion), so total land in production increased.
- Cotton became the "king" of the Southern cash crops — True. The cotton gin made short‑staple cotton profitable, spurring a massive cotton boom and making cotton the dominant Southern export.
- Manufacturing grew in the South — False (mostly). The gin spurred agricultural expansion, not industrialization; the South remained overwhelmingly agrarian and most cotton was processed in Northern and British mills.
- A social caste system was established in the South — False (misleading). The gin did not create a brand new caste system; it reinforced and sharpened existing class hierarchies by concentrating wealth and political power in a planter elite, widening the gap between wealthy planters, small farmers, and enslaved people.
- Slavery became more important and attitudes about it hardened — True. Demand for labor to plant, tend and pick expanding cotton crops greatly increased slavery’s economic importance and led to stronger pro‑slavery ideology.
- Land under production declined — False. Cotton cultivation expanded dramatically, often exhausting soil and prompting planters to clear and cultivate new lands (westward expansion), so total land in production increased.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.