Question

Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)
Responses

Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call.
Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call.

Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.

Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.

Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.

Answer 1

Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.

Explanation: The Supreme Court ruled that suspects must be informed of their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination (the right to remain silent) and their right to an attorney before custodial interrogation.