Asked by b
Which of the following is not a way in which carbon sequestration can benefit soil?
a.
decreased erosion
b.
increased water quality
c.
increased water storage
d.
increased soil quality
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
b. Increased water quality
Explanation: Sequestering carbon in soils directly improves soil quality, structure, water-holding capacity, and reduces erosion. While it can indirectly benefit water quality (by reducing runoff and sediment/nutrient losses), "increased water quality" is not a direct soil benefit.
Explanation: Sequestering carbon in soils directly improves soil quality, structure, water-holding capacity, and reduces erosion. While it can indirectly benefit water quality (by reducing runoff and sediment/nutrient losses), "increased water quality" is not a direct soil benefit.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.