Question

plz reword
Borders exist to define political authority, regulate movement and resources, and give people a basis for mutual obligations and rights. Because borders can determine who governs whom, who gets access to land and sea, and whether peoples’ identities are respected, they should be created and changed through peaceful, legally grounded processes that give voice to affected populations. My position: state boundaries should be determined primarily through negotiation and law that balances the principles of territorial integrity and self‑determination, with dispute resolution handled first by diplomacy and mediation, then by arbitration or the International Court of Justice (ICJ) when necessary; only in exceptional cases should the international community take coercive action (e.g., to stop aggression or mass human‑rights abuses).

Answer 1

Borders define political authority, regulate movement and access to resources, and provide the basis for mutual rights and obligations. Because they determine who governs whom, who controls land and sea, and whether collective identities are respected, borders ought to be created and changed through peaceful, legally grounded processes that give affected populations a meaningful voice. My view is that state boundaries should be settled primarily by negotiation and law, balancing territorial integrity with the right to self‑determination. Disputes should be resolved first through diplomacy and mediation, and, if necessary, by arbitration or the International Court of Justice; coercive international measures should be used only in exceptional cases, for example to stop aggression or widespread human‑rights abuses.