Question

Which of the following critiques the impact of international agreements on the world order?(1 point)
Responses

Institutions like the United Nations have always acted to maintain order as all countries within the organization have the same amount of power and the ability to use force.
Institutions like the United Nations have always acted to maintain order as all countries within the organization have the same amount of power and the ability to use force.

International treaties have led to world disorder because they have often been too inclusive, which has diminished the impact on world order.
International treaties have led to world disorder because they have often been too inclusive, which has diminished the impact on world order.

Economic ties and agreements with other countries do not lead to any meaningful impact in world order, as countries do not depend on one another and thus can act for their self-interest.
Economic ties and agreements with other countries do not lead to any meaningful impact in world order, as countries do not depend on one another and thus can act for their self-interest.

International agreements like the COP26 will not be impactful in creating meaningful change because it was created to replace the recent Paris Agreement, which lacked the durability to impact world order.

Answer 1

"International treaties have led to world disorder because they have often been too inclusive, which has diminished the impact on world order."

This statement is a critique of the impact of international agreements.