Asked by k
One of the results of the Schenck decision was that it removed protections for
speech intended to cause panic or harm.
those serving in the military.
those who committed crimes.
hate speech.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
speech intended to cause panic or harm.
Schenck v. United States (1919) created the "clear and present danger" standard, holding that speech that poses a real danger (e.g., incitement, causing panic or harm) is not protected by the First Amendment.
Schenck v. United States (1919) created the "clear and present danger" standard, holding that speech that poses a real danger (e.g., incitement, causing panic or harm) is not protected by the First Amendment.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.