Question

(1) The Tasmanian wolf or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia, was neither a wolf nor a tiger, but an animal that looked like a hybrid of several different species. (2) People have not spotted this animal for over fifty years, and it is believed that it is now extinct. (3) The animal had a head like a wolf, a tail like a dog, stripes like a tiger, and a pouch like a kangaroo. (4) Scientists now refer to it as the thylacine. (5) Tasmanian wolves were about one meter long, slightly larger than a fox. (6) During the day they would hide in secluded areas, such as logs, but after dark they would step out to hunt often in small packs. (7) Kangaroos, wallabies, and small birds and animals were their primary prey. (8) At one time there were a large number of Tasmanian wolves predominantly found in Australia, but people hunted them down because they at times killed chickens and sheep.
16
Sentence 1 has a non-restrictive appositive. Which sentence shows the correct way to punctuate sentence 1?
A.
The Tasmanian wolf, or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia was neither a wolf nor a tiger but an animal that looked like a hybrid of several different species.
B.
The Tasmanian wolf, or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia, was neither a wolf nor a tiger, but an animal that looked like a hybrid, of several different species.
C.
The Tasmanian wolf, or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia, was neither a wolf nor a tiger, but an animal that looked like a hybrid of several different species.
D.
The Tasmanian wolf or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia was neither a wolf nor a tiger, but an animal that looked like a hybrid of several different species.

Answer 1

C

Explanation: The nonrestrictive appositive "or Tasmanian tiger as it was called in Australia" should be set off with commas before and after, and no extra comma belongs between "hybrid" and "of."