Asked by wholemelt
According to most scientists, cold fusion
will not be a practical source of energy on Earth.
would be a practical source of energy on Earth if it were less expensive.
will be a practical source of energy on Earth within the next few decades.
will always continue to be a practical source of energy on Earth.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
"Will not be a practical source of energy on Earth."
Most scientists consider the 1989 cold-fusion claims unproven and implausible: results have not been reliably reproduced, proposed mechanisms conflict with established nuclear physics, and no credible, peer-reviewed demonstration of scalable net energy has been shown. A small minority still studies "LENR," but it remains fringe and not accepted as a practical energy source.
Most scientists consider the 1989 cold-fusion claims unproven and implausible: results have not been reliably reproduced, proposed mechanisms conflict with established nuclear physics, and no credible, peer-reviewed demonstration of scalable net energy has been shown. A small minority still studies "LENR," but it remains fringe and not accepted as a practical energy source.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.