Question

Which statement best explains the Federalists' and Anti-Federalists' views on the separation of powers?
Responses

The Federalists argued for a well-defined separation of powers to prevent tyranny, while the Anti-Federalists believed that this would not go far enough to protect individual liberties.
The Federalists argued for a well-defined separation of powers to prevent tyranny, while the Anti-Federalists believed that this would not go far enough to protect individual liberties.

The Federalists favored a centralized authority with checks and balances, while the Anti-Federalists wanted most powers to remain with the states to avoid concentration of power.
The Federalists favored a centralized authority with checks and balances, while the Anti-Federalists wanted most powers to remain with the states to avoid concentration of power.

The Federalists believed in a strong central government with a clear separation of powers, while the Anti-Federalists believed that this would create an inefficient government.
The Federalists believed in a strong central government with a clear separation of powers, while the Anti-Federalists believed that this would create an inefficient government.

The Federalists supported a single executive to ensure strong leadership, while the Anti-Federalists feared that this would lead to tyranny.

Answer 1

The best answer is:
"The Federalists favored a centralized authority with checks and balances, while the Anti-Federalists wanted most powers to remain with the states to avoid concentration of power."

Reason: Federalists supported a stronger national government organized by separation of powers and checks and balances; Anti-Federalists feared a powerful central government and preferred retaining authority at the state level (and stronger protections for individual rights).