Question

What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point)
Responses

Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.

Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.

Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.
Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.

Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power.
Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power.

Answer 1

Judicial restraint means the court avoids overturning other branches’ actions or creating new policy; judicial activism means the court actively reviews and changes laws or policies. (Choose the first response.)