Asked by k
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), why did Ernesto Miranda say his Fifth Amendment rights had been violated?
He had been stopped and searched without a judge issuing a proper warrant.
He had been tried for serious crimes without a grand jury issuing an indictment.
He had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination.
He had been jailed without being informed of the charges against him.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
He had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination.
Explanation: In Miranda v. Arizona the Court held that statements obtained during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the suspect was first informed of the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (the "Miranda warnings"), protecting the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Explanation: In Miranda v. Arizona the Court held that statements obtained during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the suspect was first informed of the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (the "Miranda warnings"), protecting the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.