Asked by 6767
Why were Northern states in favor of Hamilton’s protective tariff?
(1 point)
Responses
The tariff protected the North from paying any additional fees when exporting their goods.
The tariff protected the North from paying any additional fees when exporting their goods.
The tariff allowed manufacturers in the North to charge higher prices for their products
The tariff allowed manufacturers in the North to charge higher prices for their products
The tariff made goods produced in the North less expensive than imported goods
The tariff made goods produced in the North less expensive than imported goods
The tariff had less of an effect on businesses in the North than it did on those in the South.
The tariff had less of an effect on businesses in the North than it did on those in the South.
Question 3
Q3
Use the excerpt to answer the question that follows:
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing [supporting] infidelity [disloyalty; unfaithfulness] to existing engagements. I hold the maxim [wise saying] no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.
- Washington’s Farewell Address
Based on the excerpt, what did Washington mean when he wrote that the maxim “honesty is the best policy” should be applied to foreign relations?
(1 point)
Responses
The United States should have announced that it was cutting off relations with other nations.
The United States should have announced that it was cutting off relations with other nations.
The United States should have terminated its formal relationships with European nations.
The United States should have terminated its formal relationships with European nations.
There was no need to be coy about U.S. intentions to avoid permanent alliances in the future.
There was no need to be coy about U.S. intentions to avoid permanent alliances in the future.
The president should privately reassure foreign leaders that America stands with them but publicly maintain a separation from other nations’ policies.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Q1: The tariff made goods produced in the North less expensive than imported goods.
Q3: There was no need to be coy about U.S. intentions to avoid permanent alliances in the future.
Q3: There was no need to be coy about U.S. intentions to avoid permanent alliances in the future.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.