Asked by D4VD
Mario is writing an argument supporting a proposed bike-helmet law. Mario includes a personal example explaining that he once had a bike accident and avoided serious injury because he was wearing a helmet. If Mario revises his argument, he should
remove the personal example because it weakens his argument.
learn more about how bike helmets help protect cyclists from impact injuries.
talk to other cyclists who have stories or experiences to back up his own.
balance his personal example with well-researched, factual examples.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
balance his personal example with well-researched, factual examples.
Anecdotes can make an argument relatable, but they’re not sufficient evidence. To strengthen his case Mario should keep the personal story for emotional impact and add statistics, scientific studies, injury data, and expert opinions to support the claim that helmets reduce head injuries.
Anecdotes can make an argument relatable, but they’re not sufficient evidence. To strengthen his case Mario should keep the personal story for emotional impact and add statistics, scientific studies, injury data, and expert opinions to support the claim that helmets reduce head injuries.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.