Asked by adrian
A map showing party majorities for Party 1 and Party 2 in four districts, A, B, C, D. All of the districts are oddly shaped. Party 1 has majority in Districts A, B, C. Party 2 has majority in District D.A map showing party majorities for Party 1 and Party 2 in four districts, A, B, C, D. All of the districts are oddly shaped. Party 1 has majority in Districts A, B, C. Party 2 has majority in District D.
Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 1
Party 2
neither party
the federal government
Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 1
Party 2
neither party
the federal government
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
Party 1.
Oddly shaped districts with Party 1 winning 3 of the 4 suggest partisan gerrymandering: the party in power (Party 1) most likely drew the map to "pack" Party 2 voters into one district and "crack"/spread their own voters to win more seats.
Oddly shaped districts with Party 1 winning 3 of the 4 suggest partisan gerrymandering: the party in power (Party 1) most likely drew the map to "pack" Party 2 voters into one district and "crack"/spread their own voters to win more seats.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.