Asked by N/a
What were the primary arguments given by the justices of the Supreme Court in their decision on Plessy v. Ferguson?(1 point)
Responses
While some justices argued that the Fourteenth Amendment allowed for racial segregation in school, the Plessy v. Ferguson decisions led to the end of this practice.
While some justices argued that the Fourteenth Amendment allowed for racial segregation in school, the Plessy v. Ferguson decisions led to the end of this practice.
The Supreme Court justices unanimously argued that the principle of “separate but equal” made it so that Jim Crow laws were not subject to the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court justices unanimously argued that the principle of “separate but equal” made it so that Jim Crow laws were not subject to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Most argued that the principle of “separate but equal” satisfied the equal protection clause, but one justice dissented, saying that it could not allow racial segregation.
Most argued that the principle of “separate but equal” satisfied the equal protection clause, but one justice dissented, saying that it could not allow racial segregation.
Most justices on the Supreme Court argued that because rail cars could not be made perfectly equal in conditions, Jim Crow laws could not satisfy the Fourteenth Amendment.
Responses
While some justices argued that the Fourteenth Amendment allowed for racial segregation in school, the Plessy v. Ferguson decisions led to the end of this practice.
While some justices argued that the Fourteenth Amendment allowed for racial segregation in school, the Plessy v. Ferguson decisions led to the end of this practice.
The Supreme Court justices unanimously argued that the principle of “separate but equal” made it so that Jim Crow laws were not subject to the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court justices unanimously argued that the principle of “separate but equal” made it so that Jim Crow laws were not subject to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Most argued that the principle of “separate but equal” satisfied the equal protection clause, but one justice dissented, saying that it could not allow racial segregation.
Most argued that the principle of “separate but equal” satisfied the equal protection clause, but one justice dissented, saying that it could not allow racial segregation.
Most justices on the Supreme Court argued that because rail cars could not be made perfectly equal in conditions, Jim Crow laws could not satisfy the Fourteenth Amendment.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
Most argued that the principle of “separate but equal” satisfied the equal protection clause, but one justice dissented, saying that it could not allow racial segregation.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!