Question
Do you think that a journalist should be required to take photos also as a part of her job? Why or why not? In my own words
Answers
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
Short (1–2 sentences)
I don’t think a journalist should be universally required to take photos. Photographs are an important skill in modern reporting, but forcing every reporter to be a photographer ignores differences in training, safety, workload and the value of specialists — better to encourage multimedia skills and provide training while letting roles be flexible.
Medium (3–5 sentences)
A journalist should be able to work with visuals and ideally have basic photography skills, because photos strengthen stories, speed up publishing, and help a reporter control how a scene is presented. Still, I wouldn’t make it a hard requirement for every journalist: taking good photos requires training, equipment and time, and in some situations it can threaten safety or journalistic focus. Newsrooms should encourage and teach multimedia skills and let people specialize when quality or risk demands a dedicated photographer.
Longer (about a paragraph, good for an assignment)
I believe journalists should be comfortable using a camera and understanding visual storytelling, but they shouldn’t be forced to take photos as a universal job requirement. Visuals often make a story stronger and many news outlets now expect reporters to file photos or short video, so basic photography is a useful skill. However, quality photography takes training, practice, and equipment, and telling a complex story well can demand full attention — especially in dangerous, emotional or technical situations. Forcing every journalist to be a photographer can lower standards, create safety issues and lead to burnout. A better approach is to teach multimedia basics to all reporters, encourage them to learn photography, and keep specialist photojournalists for assignments where image quality, ethics, and safety matter most.
If you want this “in my own words” even shorter or more formal/casual, tell me the tone and length and I’ll tailor it.
I don’t think a journalist should be universally required to take photos. Photographs are an important skill in modern reporting, but forcing every reporter to be a photographer ignores differences in training, safety, workload and the value of specialists — better to encourage multimedia skills and provide training while letting roles be flexible.
Medium (3–5 sentences)
A journalist should be able to work with visuals and ideally have basic photography skills, because photos strengthen stories, speed up publishing, and help a reporter control how a scene is presented. Still, I wouldn’t make it a hard requirement for every journalist: taking good photos requires training, equipment and time, and in some situations it can threaten safety or journalistic focus. Newsrooms should encourage and teach multimedia skills and let people specialize when quality or risk demands a dedicated photographer.
Longer (about a paragraph, good for an assignment)
I believe journalists should be comfortable using a camera and understanding visual storytelling, but they shouldn’t be forced to take photos as a universal job requirement. Visuals often make a story stronger and many news outlets now expect reporters to file photos or short video, so basic photography is a useful skill. However, quality photography takes training, practice, and equipment, and telling a complex story well can demand full attention — especially in dangerous, emotional or technical situations. Forcing every journalist to be a photographer can lower standards, create safety issues and lead to burnout. A better approach is to teach multimedia basics to all reporters, encourage them to learn photography, and keep specialist photojournalists for assignments where image quality, ethics, and safety matter most.
If you want this “in my own words” even shorter or more formal/casual, tell me the tone and length and I’ll tailor it.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!