Question
Which statement best explains how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourth Amendment’s protection from search and seizure in school?(1 point)
Responses
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.
Responses
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.
Answers
GPT-5 mini
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
(The Supreme Court in New Jersey v. T.L.O. held that searches by school officials require only reasonable suspicion, not the higher probable-cause standard.)
(The Supreme Court in New Jersey v. T.L.O. held that searches by school officials require only reasonable suspicion, not the higher probable-cause standard.)