Question
Writing a critical writing based on this question, should capital punishment be reintroduce in Papua New Guinea? In a short and sharp, using simple words not using complicated words.
Answers
GPT-5 mini
Title: Should Papua New Guinea bring back the death penalty?
Intro
Many people want quick answers when crime rises. Some say the death penalty will stop violent crime. Others say it will make things worse. We must look at both sides and think clearly.
Arguments for reintroducing it
- Some people feel the death penalty gives justice to victims and families.
- It may scare some criminals and stop them from doing very bad crimes.
- It can show the state is serious about crime and protect the public.
Arguments against reintroducing it
- There is no clear proof the death penalty cuts crime more than long jail terms.
- Courts make mistakes. An innocent person could be killed.
- It can hit poor and minority people harder. Bias and weak legal aid matter.
- Bringing back executions can hurt PNG’s image and relations with other countries.
- The process is costly. Long appeals and courts cost a lot of money.
Critical view
The risks are big and the benefits are not sure. Killing people stops only one crime at a time. It does not fix why crime happens: poverty, weak police, slow courts, and lack of support for victims. If the system is weak, the chance of unfair punishment rises.
Conclusion and recommendation
Reintroducing the death penalty is a blunt answer. It brings danger of injustice and little proven benefit. A better path is to strengthen police, speed up fair trials, protect witnesses, and help communities to prevent crime. These steps keep people safer and protect human rights without the risk of killing an innocent person.
Intro
Many people want quick answers when crime rises. Some say the death penalty will stop violent crime. Others say it will make things worse. We must look at both sides and think clearly.
Arguments for reintroducing it
- Some people feel the death penalty gives justice to victims and families.
- It may scare some criminals and stop them from doing very bad crimes.
- It can show the state is serious about crime and protect the public.
Arguments against reintroducing it
- There is no clear proof the death penalty cuts crime more than long jail terms.
- Courts make mistakes. An innocent person could be killed.
- It can hit poor and minority people harder. Bias and weak legal aid matter.
- Bringing back executions can hurt PNG’s image and relations with other countries.
- The process is costly. Long appeals and courts cost a lot of money.
Critical view
The risks are big and the benefits are not sure. Killing people stops only one crime at a time. It does not fix why crime happens: poverty, weak police, slow courts, and lack of support for victims. If the system is weak, the chance of unfair punishment rises.
Conclusion and recommendation
Reintroducing the death penalty is a blunt answer. It brings danger of injustice and little proven benefit. A better path is to strengthen police, speed up fair trials, protect witnesses, and help communities to prevent crime. These steps keep people safer and protect human rights without the risk of killing an innocent person.