Question
Which of the following judgments best describes the impact of the 1930 Indian Reorganization Act (IRA)?(1 point)
Responses
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took land away from Indigenous peoples.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took land away from Indigenous peoples.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it ended the breakup of tribal land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it ended the breakup of tribal land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it gave individual people their own land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it gave individual people their own land.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took away Indigenous sovereignty.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took away Indigenous sovereignty.
Responses
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took land away from Indigenous peoples.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took land away from Indigenous peoples.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it ended the breakup of tribal land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it ended the breakup of tribal land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it gave individual people their own land.
The IRA was mostly helpful because it gave individual people their own land.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took away Indigenous sovereignty.
The IRA was mostly harmful because it took away Indigenous sovereignty.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
The IRA was mostly helpful because it ended the breakup of tribal land.
Rationale: The Indian Reorganization Act (1934) reversed the Dawes allotment policies, halted further parceling of reservation land into individual allotments, encouraged tribes to regain and manage communal land, and promoted tribal self-government—though it had limits and mixed outcomes in practice.
Rationale: The Indian Reorganization Act (1934) reversed the Dawes allotment policies, halted further parceling of reservation land into individual allotments, encouraged tribes to regain and manage communal land, and promoted tribal self-government—though it had limits and mixed outcomes in practice.