Question
Which best explains why replicating an experiment should be done by someone other than the person who originally did the experiment?
It shows that the results are the same using different methods.
It shows that the experiment is easy to do.
It shows that the results are as expected.
It shows that the experiment is designed properly.
It shows that the results are the same using different methods.
It shows that the experiment is easy to do.
It shows that the results are as expected.
It shows that the experiment is designed properly.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The best explanation for why replicating an experiment should be done by someone other than the person who originally conducted the experiment is:
**It shows that the results are the same using different methods.**
This emphasizes the importance of objectivity and reliability in scientific research, as it helps to confirm that the findings are not influenced by the original researcher's biases or specific techniques. Replication by an independent party increases confidence in the validity and generalizability of the results.
**It shows that the results are the same using different methods.**
This emphasizes the importance of objectivity and reliability in scientific research, as it helps to confirm that the findings are not influenced by the original researcher's biases or specific techniques. Replication by an independent party increases confidence in the validity and generalizability of the results.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!